Elton’s wedding

HomeForumGreen RoomElton’s wedding Login | Register
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1325
    sky.dub
    Participant

    Great to see Sky News covering the wedding of Elton John and his partner, David Furnish. Kay Burley is at Windsor Castle and it was the top story at one o’clock.

    #14672
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    It’s not a wedding, a wedding is between a Man and a Woman.

    It’s a civil ceremony.

    #14671
    sky.dub
    Participant

    Yes you’re technically correct. But it’s great to see them covering it so positively.

    #14670
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    sky.dub+Dec 21 2005, 04:29 PM(sky.dub @ Dec 21 2005, 04:29 PM)

    Yes you’re technically correct. But it’s great to see them covering it so positively.

    No I am correct.

    sizeo:7/sizeoI don’t do PC.sizec/sizec

    #14668
    sky.dub
    Participant

    i said you were correct. This thread is about the coverage by Sky news of the ceremony and civil partnerships in general. If you have a sensible view on this…please feel free to exercise your opinion.

    #14669
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    sky.dub+Dec 21 2005, 06:09 PM(sky.dub @ Dec 21 2005, 06:09 PM)

    i said you were correct. This thread is about the coverage by Sky news of the ceremony and civil partnerships in general. If you have a sensible view on this…please feel free to exercise your opinion.

    No you I was technically correct.

    You dismissed the facts.

    I do have a sensible view, which is pointing out a factual event.

    If you don’t like what you see then put on your rose tinted spectacles.

    I am exercising my opinions.

    sizeo:7/sizeoSee above.sizec/sizec

    #14667
    sky.dub
    Participant

    what facts!? what are you going on about!? It isn’t a wedding, I said you were correct… What is your problem. Once again I repeat: this thread concerns the excellent coverage of the ceremony. See above.

    #14666
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    sky.dub+Dec 21 2005, 06:31 PM(sky.dub @ Dec 21 2005, 06:31 PM)

    what facts!? what are you going on about!? It isn’t a wedding, I said you were correct… What is your problem. Once again I repeat: this thread concerns the excellent coverage of the ceremony. See above.

    You wrote I was ‘technically correct’.

    That means there is some doubt.

    Fact=’s civial ceremony.

    Not fact=’s wedding.

    No technicality whatsoever there.

    As for Sky TV covering it, who cares, there are things like this everyday of the week, they should plough their time into reporting on issues that are more important.

    #14665
    sky.dub
    Participant

    The civil partnership will give the same rights to a same sex couple as if a heterosexual couple were to get married. Thus, one can deduce that the two aren’t too dissimilar and emerges my point that technically, it is not a wedding.

    #14664
    fletch
    Participant

    Lee Smith+Dec 21 2005, 02:23 PM(Lee Smith @ Dec 21 2005, 02:23 PM)

    It’s not a wedding, a wedding is between a Man and a Woman.

    It’s a civil ceremony.

    Can you please point me to your source for this “fact”

    A Wedding according to http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=weddingdictionary.com lists the following definitions

    1. To take as a spouse; marry.

    2. To perform the marriage ceremony for; join in matrimony.

    3. To unite closely: a style that weds form and function.

    4. To cause to adhere devotedly or stubbornly: He was wedded to the idea of building a new school.

    A Wedding according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weddingwikipedia.org is defined as “A wedding is a civil or religious ceremony at which the beginning of a marriage is celebrated.”

    Not once is the gender of either participant mentioned,

    I think the original poster merely wanted to praise the coverage of the ceremony by Sky News and not enter a debate into the semantics of the words he chose to describe same.

    You attack him for not being politically correct when you yourself and trying to back up your argument with ill-informed hear-say

    #14662
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    Interesting how you then create a new id to try backup your views.

    #14663
    fletch
    Participant

    Lee Smith+Dec 21 2005, 07:13 PM(Lee Smith @ Dec 21 2005, 07:13 PM)

    Interesting how you then create a new id to try backup your views.

    Interesting how you choose not to comment when you know that you are losing the argument.

    I can assure you that this is not a phantom account. I was browsing the forums and came across this thread. Your very blatant homophobic undertones were enough to make me create a new account.

    #14660
    rob237
    Participant

    sky.dub+Dec 21 2005, 01:29 PM(sky.dub @ Dec 21 2005, 01:29 PM)

    Great to see Sky News covering the wedding of Elton John and his partner, David Furnish. Kay Burley is at Windsor Castle and it was the top story at one o’clock.

    Was the ‘marriage’ coverage at 13.00 as nauseating as that at 08.00?

    The breakfast time blanket coverage was, of course, led by E.Holmes Esq – aka Mr Dumb Downer!

    Cheers

    Robt P.

    #14661
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    fletch+Dec 21 2005, 07:29 PM(fletch @ Dec 21 2005, 07:29 PM)

    Lee Smith+Dec 21 2005, 07:13 PM(Lee Smith @ Dec 21 2005, 07:13 PM)

    Interesting how you then create a new id to try backup your views.

    Interesting how you choose not to comment when you know that you are losing the argument.

    I can assure you that this is not a phantom account. I was browsing the forums and came across this thread. Your very blatant homophobic undertones were enough to make me create a new account.

    You are a moron. You admitted you ‘had to create a new account’.

    Great defence calling people homophobic that don’t agree with you, and bobby, I know more than you!

    Also like I sit here waiting for your very post, you freak!

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.